Thursday, December 1, 2011

Cosmopolitan: The wonder magazine

The stereotype for teenage girls is to be coming into the more adult world and the be very talkative. Where do they all turn for advice and help, because at this point they don't want to talk to their parents anymore? All the answers lie in a magazine called Cosmopolitan.

The focus of Cosmopolitan is all about girls. Their make-up, relationships and sex advice. Most of the stories are real-life examples from readers writing in and talking about their experiences and then also professional experts, or doctors or lawyers or what have you, giving advice and sharing facts.

The articles are a mix of long and short, some all on one page but a few in each magazine are longer. Most of the magazine is actually all ads! At least 5 rip out ads, a few 'smell me' perfume ones, but mostly they are made up of clothes line pictures and advertisements. Total advertisements include, perfume, body-car, clothes, birth-control, make-up, hair products, and nail products.

The actual look of the magazine is 'LOOK AT ME!!' It is build of very flashy images and pictures are the bulk of the magazine. The trend is to have lots of bright colors and eye-popping attractive images or photo-shoped pictures. There is also a lot of subliminal advertising, such as an page that says, "Want a better Boyfriend? There is an app for that!" This clearly advertises Iphone and the App store from Apple.

They also have a lot of pictures of celebrities as a way of advertising just about anything related to the interests of the readers. They relate the items that a certain celebrity is wearing to the store you can buy tem and them what you can wear with it.

Between the print vs. online, one major difference is the ability to provide instant feedback online, vs sending a letter to the editor for print. It is faster and works better for todays culture on instant everything. Another difference is there are more quizzes and games online, although there are some in the magazine, there are more online, and you don't have to buy the issue to participate. The third main difference is the search-ability and the compactness of the online version. Online, you can search through many articles as simple as using Google, meanwhile it would take forever to search through a bunch of hard copies. It is also a lot more cumbersome to have a lot of magazines lying around, when they are all online.



Cosmo online here:

There is no other kind of magazine that comes close to being able to talk about such personal things such as sex and relationships advice and have the most make-up and fashion tips in one place. It is pretty much unrivaled in competition. It a teenage girls best friend. 

The main point of the magazine is to talk about all the things we have listed above, however, that isn't how they draw in their readers. Readers are drew in by the constant big lettered preview of a story on the  cover about something personal or sexy to either male or female. I would guess that about 90 percent of the time it is about sex.

Print has the advantage of mobility and at the same time being a hard physical copy, which some readers like better than reading on a computer. This can also be one of its' downfalls though since you have buy the physical copy while the online is free. Another downfall it that a physical copy can only contain a certain amount of information while online is unlimited. Online also can be bad because you must have interent to be able to access it, while anyone can get the the hard copy. 

Target audience is primarily women in the range of 12 to 25.  All the ads reflect this, as shown by the style of clothing and make-up and the relationship and sex advice is most of the time for the women's eyes only. 



There are some offensive messages and stereotypes that play into Cosmo. Articles that condem men or assume certain things about them can be both. They can try and hit the generalizations, but not everyone is the same. It try's to get inside a man's head, but sometimes with limited success. Once such stereotypes is that all men are sex-driven all the time. 

We prefer print better mainly for the same reason we still read books; we like the physical aspect to reading an article. While online can be helpful sometimes, the original magazine provides more of an experience than just going online.  

Online better serves the audience because it not only allows the reader to read the original article but hen to see other peoples feedback as well. You can take what you read and then see more real-life examples  to get the most out of what it is you came there to read for. 

After reading this magazine it almost always sparks a conversation between friends or a significant other.    The quizzes in the magazine area also a good way to interact with it. 

With this assignment we observed the online copy more, and found more use to it for readers, but we both still prefer the hard copy. The magazine is still the primary way to read this type of article. 

If you would like to follow Cosmo on Twitter:

Or if you would like to start receiving Cosmopolitan, it is here on Amazon:




Wednesday, November 9, 2011

Inception: Plato's Baby



Plato was know most famously for his analogy of 'the cave'. The cave posses a scenario that suggests that human understanding is subject to what the person has seen or experienced. In essence he takes this and says that whatever a person sees or believes is only in their head; it is just a thought or 'form' as he calls it that makes reality real. The object or reality is nothing but a form in your head, and thus it is real.

Who would think that this famous philosophers' thoughts would be revisited, transformed and twisted into a movie in the 21st Century? Not most people, but this is what has happened. Inception is based on the idea  that what is in a persons head, in their dreams, can be more real and powerful than actual reality.

The reason we chose this topic is mainly because it is a harsh change from the 'reality' of modern entertainment today. I would say that most people are attracted to the reality shows that flourish and are abundant today, but this movie is one that, once again, you can walk out of the theater from seeing it, and go, 'what just happened?' The movie forces you into another reality that opens your mind and forces you to think about what is really going on. It has excellent plot and storyline, and a crucial element of suspense and drama to pull you in. It stretches the mind to ask, 'what if'? Past movies such as The Matrix have also opened this door. It breaks the drone of reality, reality, reality that we seem to be in, a questions, what really is real reality?

Although, yes, this is a work of fiction, not meant to be taken quite as seriously as some may think, it still can set brains to think more than to find out which Kardashin is getting fake, or not, married. The director, Christopher Nolan, has had this movie in mind for over 10 years, drawing his original idea and thoughts from 'Star Wars'. He started out with a few smal movies, but resurrected the Batman series, which we all know has gone off very well. After that, he had the budget and ability to go after  his dream movie, Inception.

MTV actually did a small profile on him in an article that can be found here:
 http://www.mtv.com/news/articles/1643698/inception-director-reveals-his-star-wars-inspiration.jhtml

The target audience so to speak, is everyone. Even those addicted to Snooki, this can bring them out to the box office, even if simply to know what all the controversy is about. Unfortunately, this does not appear to set any trends for future movies, as we are all still in the addicted to reality TV phase.

Inception was a good movie, and it went over well, both due to the numbers of people who turned out to see it, and those who are still watching for the second or third or even fourth time, as it provoke wonder and suspense. Strengths to the movie would include capturing the audience with drama, suspense and a wonderful sense of amazement and awesomeness. The special effects where not to be outdone, and yet it still had a plot and storyline. Weaknesses might include that if you aren't ready for it, you can get lost in the maze of what is happening and really real in the movie. Not to mention that it can be rather intense at times.

This movie may or may not be talked about for years to come, but it definitely made an impression. It was talked about, and still is , for at least a year. It wasn't life changing, but it won' be forgotten in at least the minds of this generation.

In summary, this movie we both enjoyed, although getting lost at times. It provided a movie that drew you in to get lost in what is or isn't real. It wasn't reality TV. It question, in a way, what the human mind is capable of and what or how can we tell what is real. It was a movie that could once again lean us to grasp the future and dream of what is a what has yet to come, and settling on the future is only held back by our own dreams.

You can check out a trailer of the movie here:
http://youtu.be/66TuSJo4dZM

Thursday, October 20, 2011

Got PMS? Have a glass of milk!




Got Milk? has been a staple advertisement since 1993, about as old as we are. The slogan has been put on buses, written on tee shirts, and plastered on many different building. Not to mentioned the hundreds of celebrities both cartoon and real that have said either "got milk" or have sported a milk mustache. 

But this new campaign from this last July in absolutely amazing. They have truly outdone themselves. The ad centers around a guy who assumes or knows that his significant other is on her monthly pre-menstrual cycle. The add presents the 'fact' that milk helps to relieve some of the symptoms of PMS, and then offers some sort of apologetic or sarcastic remark. 

The type of approach here is the plain folks appeal. It shows an average boyfriend that is worried that because it is 'that time of the month', she is agitated, and he might get eaten alive. So he gets some milk to help her relax. It attaches milk to PMSing, and another reason to go out and get milk at least once a month. Funny advertisement for guys, but kind of has a negative connotation. With this negative attachment, a bit of fear tactics might also be in play due to the fear of not having milk and being attacked by a hormonal raging girlfriend. 

However, not all people might find this ad funny. Some women might be offended by the ad and therefore actually work against getting the consumer to go out and buy milk. The target audience would most likely be men and younger people. 

The only place we found this ad was online both as pictures and a microsite that has a lot other funny content geared toward helping men during this time of month, but neither of us could get on too the site. If you have better luck, just Google: everythingidoiswrong.org.

This commercial is a somewhat new approach to the bluntness of talking about PMSing, although it has been touched before by certain tampon commercials. 

It does stereotype woman as raging monsters during their period, and guy as helpless, but in our opinion shouldn't be too upsetting to someone with a bit of humor. 

We definitely think this message is memorable due to the humor. We already do buy milk, but this doesn't do anything to change opinions about milk or how much we will buy. It should hit the target audience to a degree, but we think it should be put out there more and better target those out there who aren't buying milk and those who would find it funny. 

Not only does this ad have a bit of awesome hilariousness to it, it also turns out to be true! Studies that were reported in the link below to the New York Times, show that it actually does help. 

However, closely tied with this new campaign we also found another campaign designed specifically to get the voice of the women out there as to a reason why the man should go out and get the milk. We found these just as hilarious, however, a little more offensive. Enjoy!